Low RNA Binding Strength of Human X Chromosome May Explain X Chromosome Inactivation

Department of Genetics, Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Lab of Laboratory Animal, Shijiazhuang 050017, Hebei Province, China; 15613380807@163.com (N.J.); lifangyiyaa@163.com (L.Y.); songzhixue123@163.com (Z.S.); liushf@126.com (S.L.); libo_su@yahoo.com (L.S.); 17803211887@163.com (S.Y.); 18311646841@163.com (H.C.); wangxiufang@live.cn (X.W.); zhanjun_lv@hotmail.com (Z.L.) * Correspondence: wangxiufang@live.cn (X. W.) and zhanjun_lv@hotmail.com (Z. L.); Tel: +86-311-86266844. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 8 November 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201811.0066.v2


1.Introduction
Aging is the most important risk factor inducing human aged diseases and death and epigenetic plays an important role in aging [1,2].Two X chromosomes of female mammals randomly inactivate one of paternal or maternal X chromosome in early embryonic development and all the daughter cells produced from these cells retain the same feature of X chromosome inactivation, which is called X chromosome inactivation (XCI) [3].XCI is the important phenomenon of epigenetic and the model of studying the mechanisms of epigenetic [4].The dosage compensation of X-linked gene products between the sexes is crucial for growth and development [5].In Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans (C.elegans), the activity of female X chromosomes is half of that of male X chromosomes to maintain a balance [6][7][8][9].X chromosome inactivation (XCI) occurs early in mammalian development [10] and serves to equalize the dosage of X chromosome gene products between females and males by transcriptional silencing one of the X chromosomes in female mammals [11].
Although previous studies have indicated that two X-linked genes (Xist and Tsix) [12][13][14] and differential DNA methylation [15] have been certified to play an important role in XCI, the definite mechanism of XCI remains exclusive.
Repetitive sequences are ubiquitous in multicellular eukaryotes, which constitute more than 60% of the whole human genome [16,17], and are considered to be crucial for maintaining life activities of organism.Higher abundance of repetitive sequences has been detected in mammalian sex chromosomes than autosomes [18][19][20] and accumulated evidences have indicated that repetitive sequences play crucial roles in XCI [21][22][23][24].Researching the association between repetitive sequences and XCI may provide new clues for the mechanism of XCI which contributes to the normal growth, development and aging of mammals.
Long interspersed element, LINE-1 (L1) and short interspersed element (Alu) are two of most key repetitive sequences, which account for 17% and 10% of human genome respectively.L1 is the most overrepresented type of repetitive sequences on the X chromosome in eutherians and the copy number of L1 in X chromosome was higher than that in the autosomes [25].Although XCI results in the silence of most genes on one X chromosome, approximately 30% of genes located on the short arm of the X chromosome (Xp) escape from XCI [26].Moreover, XCI can spread to a distance of 21.4 kb in neighboring regions, and may play a role in cis X inactivation [27].High density of L1 sequence in X chromosomes was reported to promote heterochromatin to spread throughout the X chromosome [28][29][30].Alu was reported to be involved in XCI as well [23], while the precise role of Alu needs to be uncovered.
Since XCI is a mechanism of gene dosage compensation by regulating gene expression [31][32][33][34] and our previous studies proved that L1s and Alus played a role in regulating gene expression [35][36], we speculated that these two repetitive sequences (L1 and Alu) may be involved in the process of XCI by regulating gene expression.
In human cells, interaction of RNAs and DNAs can activate gene expression [37][38][39][40] and this phenomenon is called RNA activation [41,42].Our previous studies showed that RNAs specifically activate gene expression in a position, length and sequence dependent manner, providing evidence of RNA regulatory networks [43,44].
As a regulatory mechanism of gene expression, RNA activation may be associated with XCI.We supposed that RNAs may activate gene expression by binding to DNAs to prevent chromatin over-packing.Based on it, the strength of RNA binding to DNA (RNA binding strength) can be used to assess chromatin activity.
In this paper, to explore whether RNA binding strength involves the XCI we used bioinformatics methods to analyze the RNA binding strength to X chromosome and autosomes.The transient and stable transfections were used to observe the effects of one repetitive sequence on another repetitive sequence located in same expression vector, which simulates the effects between repetitive sequences located on chromosomes.Based on our bioinformatics analyses and experimental results, we proved that the low RNA binding strength of human X chromosome was associated with XCI.

2.1.1.The comparison of RNA binding strengths of X chromosome and autosomes
We analyzed the RNA binding strength of human autosomes 1-22 and the X chromosome.The chromosome DNAs were divided into 50-kb fragments that were recorded as a set of numbers of DNA 7-nt strings via bioinformatics methods.RNA 7-nt strings were looked up for RNAs transcribed from tonsil germinal center B cells.
The DNA 7-nt strings were multiplied by strings of RNAs, and the sum of products represents the strength of binding the 50-kb DNA sequences to RNAs (RNA binding strength algorithm is written in Materials and Methods).This analysis revealed that the binding strength of RNAs to X chromosome is significantly lower than that to all autosomes other than chromosomes 8, 11, 18, 20, 21 and 22 (Table 1).We used chr19 as a representative of autosomes since the genes in chr19 are highly expressed.As shown in Figure 1, RNA binding strength and its dispersion degree of X chromosome (Figure 1A) are lower than in chr19 (Figure 1B).Approximately 30% genes located on short arm of X chromosome (Xp) escape from XCI while Xq is almost entirely inactivated.Carrel et al [44] reported that 29 of 224 X-linked genes escaped from XCI and 2 of these genes escaping from XCI locate on Xq and other 27 genes locate on Xp (Figure 2).The results of bioinformatic methods revealed that RNA binding strength of Xq was significantly lower than that of Xp (p<0.01)(Figure 2, Table 1)., 4×10 6 , 6×10 6 , 8×10 6 and 10×10 6 .The x-axis represents the gene position.

2.1.4.The comparison of RNA binding strengths of inactivation regions with regions escaping from XCI on Xp
Since approximately 30% genes located on Xp escape from XCI, we compared the RNA binding strengths of inactivation regions with regions escaping from XCI on Xp and found that RNA binding strength of inactivation regions was significantly lower than that of the regions escaping from XCI (Table 2).# represents that RNA binding strength of the three inactivation regions is significantly lower than that of the three regions escaping from XCI (p<0.01).

Distribution of repetitive sequences within 1 Mb in the X-inactivation centre
In order to analyze the roles of repetitive sequences in XCI, the distribution of repetitive sequences within the 1-Mb downstream of the RPS4X gene in the X-inactivation centre was compared.As shown in Figure 3, L1s were the most abundant repetitive sequences within 1 Mb.Repetitive sequences (L1, Alu, MIR, L2, L3, LTR and DNA elements) are distributed in clusters, and there are alternative distributions of different repetitive sequence clusters in the 1 Mb (Figure 3).There are peaks of other repetitive sequences at the low ebb regions of L1 (Table 3).gene in Xq13.A 1-Mb fragment within Xq13 was divided into 2-kb fragments.The distribution of L1, Alu, MIR, L2, L3, LTR and DNA elements was analyzed.The x-axis represents the sequence position, while the y-axis represents the percentage of repetitive sequence bases.

The results of experiments revealed transcribed repetitive sequences activated EGFP reporter gene expression 2.2.1. The transcribed L1s activated EGFP reporter gene expression
The results from bioinformatics analysis have demonstrated that RNA binding strengths of X chromosome are low and there are alternative distributions of different repetitive sequence clusters.To further prove whether the repetitive sequences in human X chromosome involve in XCI, we cloned L1 from human Xq13, the X-inactivation centre, and constructed different expression vectors carrying combined sense and antisense repetitive sequences.Effects of sense or antisense L1 sequences on expression of EGFP reporter were examined in transiently and stably transfected HeLa cells, simulating the effects of repetitive sequences located on chromosomes.

Transcribed Alus activated EGFP reporter gene expression
To further prove whether the repetitive squences in human X chromosome involve in XCI, we also cloned Alu from human Xq13, the center of XCI, and constructed different expression vectors carrying combined sense and antisense Firstly, the effects of repetitive sequences locating in different plasmids on EGFP gene expression using co-transfection methods were observed.HeLa cells were co-transfected transiently with modulator plasmids carrying sense or antisense repetitive sequences (derived from pcDNA3.1), and with reporter plasmids carrying sense repetitive sequences (derived from pEGFP-C1).The EGFP labeled amount of cells co-transfected transiently with C1-Alu and pcAluas (Table 4, Figure 6B) was 0.73 fold that of co-transfected with C1-Alu and pcAlu (Table 4, Figure 6A), which revealed significant antisense inhibition (P<0.05, Figure 6H).
Next, the effects of repetitive sequences locating in the same plasmids on downstream EGFP gene expression in transient and stable transfected cells were compared.C1-Alu-sense-sense, C1-Alu-sense-antisense, C1-Alu-sense-control plasmids (Table 4) were transfected into HeLa cells.Then, expression of EGFP was determined using flow cytometry after transient or stable transfection.Following transient transfection, the EGFP-labeled amount of C1-Alu-sense-antisense (Figure 6D) was 0.94 fold that of C1-Alu-sense-sense (Figure 6C), which reveals a trend in antisense inhibition (no significant difference, Figure 6I).
The results of stable transfection are different from that of transient transfection, the EGFP labeled amount of C1-Alu-sense-antisense (Figure 6F) was 4.0 fold that of C1-Alu-sense-sense (Figure 6E) and 2.9 fold that of C1-Alu-sense-control (Figure 6G).These results show that combined sense-antisense repetitive sequences located in the same plasmid activate the EGFP reporter gene in stable transfection (Figure 6J).
There was no significant difference between the EGFP labeled amount of C1-Alu-sense-sense and C1-Alu-sense-control. EGFP labeled amount induced by different Alu expression vectors after stable transfection was plotted as mean ± SD values.The EGFP labeled amount of C1-Alu-sense-antisense is significant higher than that of C1-Alu-sense-sense (*p<0.01),illustrating that combined sense-antisense Alu repetitive sequences activate the EGFP gene during stable transfection.

Discussion
The previous studies have demonstrated that binding of RNAs and DNAs may play a role in activating gene expression, which is named RNA activation.We proposed that RNAs binding strength can be used to assess chromatin activity and the low RNA binding strength may be one of reasons of XCI.We analyzed the simulated RNA binding strengths to DNA segments within entire autosomes and X chromosome using bioinformatics methods.According to these analyses, we found that RNA binding strength to the X chromosome was significantly lower than that to autosomes (except chromosomes 8, 11, 18, 20, 21 and 22) (Table 1).Since Xq is almost completely inactive, we further compared RNA binding strength to Xq with that to autosomes, which revealed that the RNA binding strength of Xq is significantly lower than that to autosomes (except chromosomes 11, 20 and 22) (Table 1).Although the RNA binding strength to chromosomes 11, 20 and 22 is less than or near equal to that of Xq, the standard deviations of RNA binding strengths in these three chromosomes were significantly higher than that of Xq.After analyzing the fragments possessing upper half values of RNA binding strengths in Xq and autosomes, we found that the mean value of RNA binding strengths of these fragments in Xq was lower than that in all autosomes.Hence, we speculated that high mean values of RNA binding strengths and more fragments possessing high RNA binding strengths may always accompany with more active chromosome.Approximately 30% genes located on Xp escape from XCI while Xq almost entirely inactivated.The results of bioinformatic methods proved that RNA binding strength of Xq was significantly lower than that of Xp (p<0.01)(Figure 2, Table 1) and the RNA binding strength of the inactivation regions on Xp was significantly lower than that of activation regions (p<0.01 ) (Table 2).
These findings provide new clues for uncovering the mechanism of genes escape from a roughly inactivated X chromosome.Based on our results, we proposed a hypothesis about XCI, i.e. the low RNA binding strength of human X chromosome may be one of reasons of XCI.Since the RNA binding strength of Xq is low, so the X chromosome may be first affected when the activating strength of the RNAs weakens.The low dispersion degree of the RNA binding strength of Xq implies that Xq lacks fragments with high RNA binding strength, which may easily causes silencing.
In this study, we constructed the modulator plasmids carrying L1s or Alus sequences and reporter plasmids carrying L1s or Alus, which were co-transfected into HeLa cells to study the effects of modulator plasmids on EGFP gene expression in reporter plasmids.Our findings revealed that antisense RNAs of repetitive sequences can inhibit the transcription of sense RNAs during transient transfection which was consistent with previous studies.Previous study has shown that antisense RNAs can inhibit the transcription of sense RNAs [45,46].For instance, the transcriptions of the multidrug resistance genen (mdr1) [47], LacZ in Escherichia coli [48,49] and replicase in Agrobacterium tumefaciens were inhibited by their antisense RNAs [49].
Our results are consistent with the above reports.
The effects of sense or antisense repetitive sequences locating in same plasmids on gene expression of downstream EGFP were applied to simulate the effects of neighboring repetitive sequences in cis.Previous studies have indicated that more than 70% of mouse genome transcriptional units occur by way of antisense transcription and antisense knockdown can result in the reduction of sense transcripts [50,51] which implied that antisense RNAs can more commonly promote the transcription of sense RNAs within the genome.In our study, antisense RNAs were found to activate the transcription of sense RNAs in stably transfected cells which were consistent with previous studies [50,51] .However, this phenomenon was not found in transiently transfected cells.Stable or transient transfection was depended on whether the exogenous DNA was integrated into the host genome.Nontranscribed repetitive sequences contribute to the silencing of genes, while transcribed repetitive sequences contribute to the activation of genes [52].Hence, we concluded that gene activation induced by combined repetitive sequences may be associated with DNA replication.During DNA replication and transcription, the wrapping of DNA and histone was reduced [43], we hypothesize that naked DNA was likely to form a single stranded DNA that may bind with RNAs, and affect gene expression by RNA activation.
The dosage compensation strategies in female mammals are achieved by inactivating the entire chromosome and in Drosphila and C. elegans by decreasing chromosomal activity [6,7,9,51] .The previous study has indicated that the inactivation of the X chromosome occurs through the cascade from the inactivation center [51].X chromosome contains abundant repetitive sequences and accumulated evidences have indicated that repetitive sequences play crucial roles in XCI [22][23][24].
So we analyzed the distribution of repetitive sequences within 1 Mb sequence of the X-inactivation centre, we found a dominant distribution characteristic of repetitive sequences.The analyzed seven repetitive sequences (L1, Alu, MIR, L2, L3, LTR and DNA elements) were distributed in clusters, and there are alternative distributions of different repetitive sequence clusters in the 1 Mb (Figure 3).Peaks of other repetitive sequences were observed at the low ebb regions of L1 (Table 3).We propose that the gene activation induced by a repetitive sequence cluster needs the support of flanking repetitive sequences to form a cascade of gene activation.The inactivation of any one cluster can reduce the activity of flanking repetitive sequences, which lead to a cascade of gene inactivation.Based on above analyses, we proposed that the entire X chromosome inactivation or activation may be induced by the distribution characteristics of repetitive sequences in X chromosome.
In early embryonic cells, activation factors are abundant and inhibitory factors are less, which lead to both X chromosomes being activated in female cells.During cell differentiation, factors (i.e.RNA) that activate X chromosomes decreases; and thus, two X chromosomes compete for the same activation factors.As a result, a slight imbalance of role factors on one X chromosome may be amplified, and subsequently lead to the inactivation of the entire X chromosome due to cascade actions.
In this study, based on our experiments of gene activation induced by repetitive sequences and bioinformatics analysis results of RNA binding strengths, we proposed a model for XCI (illustrated in Figure 7).The main idea of this model is that the low RNA binding strength of human X chromosome may be the one of reasons of XCI and the cross distribution characteristics of different repetitive sequence clusters leading to a cascade of gene activation or gene inactivation may be the reason of transcriptional silencing one of the X chromosomes in female mammals.In Figure 7, "A"-"F" on the x-axis represent regions that contain different repetitive sequence clusters, while the y-axis represents RNA binding strength.The adjacent different repetitive sequence clusters appear cross distribution so that the activation of any cluster can lead to activation of its adjacent clusters and the inactivation of any cluster can lead to inactivation of its adjacent clusters, which forms the reason that leads to cascade of activation or inactivation of X chromosome."F" represents a region possessing super-high RNA binding strength and "E" represents a region with low RNA binding strength.The inactivation of "E" region can not lead to the complete illustrates that XCI is associated with the genome environment of the X chromosome [11].The observation that female diploid cells support the activation of one X chromosome, and female tetraploid cells support the activation of two X chromosomes also provides evidence for the relation between XCI and genome environment of the X chromosome [53,54].The activation of the X chromosome needs RNAs produced from itself and RNAs produced from the genome.After early embryonic cells, activating factors (RNAs, transcription factors, etc.) decrease and inhibitors (chromatin packaging, DNA modification, etc) increase so that the cells can only support the activation of one X chromosome.This may also explain why diploid cells support the activation of one X chromosome and why tetraploid cells support the activation of two X chromosomes.
Once the maternal or paternal X chromosomes are inactivated, they will remain inactivated in daughter cells, which is a well-known epigenetic process [55,56] In order to describe the possibility of RNAs transcribed in certain cells binding with DNAs, we introduced the concept of RNA binding strength.The RNA binding strength algorithm was calculated based on the principle that more complementary sequences of RNAs and DNAs result in greater binding between RNAs and DNAs [42].For example, when there is one 5'-TTTTTTT DNA molecule and 10 5'-AAAAAAA RNA molecules in a certain volume solution, the possibility of DNA binding with RNAs is 10 (10×1=10).If there are 10 5'-TTTTTTT DNA molecules, the possibility of DNA binding with RNAs is 100 (10×10=100).DNA sequences from the indicated chromosomes were divided into many 50-kb segments and were re-coded as numbers of 7-nt strings using all possible 7-nt strings (4 7 =16,384).We used the product of the number of the same 7-nt string in RNA and DNA fragment as the RNA binding strength of this 7-nt string.One-thousand genes highly expressed in human tonsil germinal center B cells were selected, and the 7-nt string numbers for these genes were calculated from the sense strand (including introns and exons).The 7-nt string numbers in one gene multiplied by the expression frequency of the gene (Lib.5601;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/UniGene/)resulted in the calculated numbers of the 7-nt string for the gene.Table 6 illustrates the calculation method of RNA binding strengths in a 50-kb DNA fragment.The sum of the numbers for the 7-nt strings of 1,000 genes was regarded as the simulated total RNAs (total RNAs) in cells (Table 5, C column).The simulated RNA binding strength (Table 5, E column and E16385) was defined as the sum of the products of the RNA and the corresponding 7-nt strings numbers within each 50-kb fragment.Therefore, the RNA binding strength represents a measure of the amount of RNA that can bind to each 50-kb region.

4.4.Analysis of the distribution of repetitive sequences in the center of XCI
Xq13 is the X inactivation center.The RPS4X gene is located on Xq13.We analyzed repetitive sequences within 1 Mb (5'-3', 9810061 nt-10810060 nt) including the RPS4X gene and its 5' sequence, based on the direction of genomics.The 1-Mb sequence was divided into 2-kb fragments.These repetitive sequences were determined within each 2-kb fragment, and percentages of the base number of repetitive sequences that account for the 2-kb fragments were calculated.The Figure 3 displayed the distribution of repetitive sequences in the X inactivation center was drawn using sequence positions on the x-axis and percentages of the repetitive sequence bases on the y-axis.

4.7.Determination of EGFP-positive cells with flow cytometry or fluorescence microscope
The transfected HeLa cells were collected in 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes.Cells were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 2,000 rpm at 4°C, washed twice with PBS, and suspended in 0.7 ml of PBS.The expression of EGFP was determined using flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter, USA) [36] and displayed as an 'EGFP labeled amount'.
EGFP labeled amount = (X mean of EGFP positive cells) × (percentage of EGFP positive cells), where X mean (mean value of fluorescence intensity in each cell) = ∑(X)/n [42].At least three independent experiments were performed for all studies.
Images are representative of at least three independent experiments.Group comparisons were made using mean ± S.D. and t-test.Statistical significances were defined as p < 0.05.
The expression of the EGFP protein was also assessed by inspecting HeLa cells stably transfected with expression vectors using a fluorescence microscope.

5.Conclusions
In conclusion, our study found that the repetitive sequences distribute in clusters in X chromosome; combination of sense and antisense repetitive sequences (L1 and Alu) can activate gene expression which may be affected by interactions between RNAs and DNAs; the RNA binding strength of Xq and its dispersion degree is the lowest in all human chromosomes and the regions with high RNA binding strengths in X chromosome are consistent with the regions that escape from XCI.Based on these findings, we proposed a new model of XCI that the low RNA binding strength of human X chromosome may be one of reasons of XCI and the cross distribution characteristics of different repetitive sequence clusters leading to a cascade of gene activation or gene inactivation may be the reason of transcriptional silencing one of the X chromosomes in female mammals.These findings provide new clues for the functions of repetitive sequences and the mechanism of XCI.However, further research was needed to explore the detailed functions of repetitive sequences in XCI.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Combined sense-antisense 280-1 repetitive sequences activate the EGFP reporter gene with stable transfection, but not with transient transfection.(A-B) Representative EGFP gene expression induced by different 280-1 expression vectors were co-transfected into HeLa cells.EGFP expression was determined using a flow cytometer after co-transfection.(C-D) Representative EGFP gene expression induced by different 280-1 expression vectors were transiently transfected into HeLa cells.(E-G) Representative EGFP gene expression induced by different 280-1 expression vectors were stably transfected into HeLa cells.(H) The EGFP labeled amount induced by different expression vectors after co-transfection was plotted as mean ± SD values.(I) The EGFP labeled amount induced by different 280-1 expression vectors after transient transfection was plotted as mean ± SD values.The EGFP labeled amount of C1-280-1-sense-antisense was significant lower than that of C1-280-1-sense-sense (*p<0.01).(J) The EGFP labeled amount induced by different expression vectors after stable transfection was

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. EGFP protein expression in HeLa cells stably transfected with 280-1 expression vectors were detected using a fluorescence microscope.(A-C) Representative images of EGFP protein expression in HeLa cells stably transfected with expression vectors.(W): white light; (F): fluorescent light.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Combined sense-antisense Alu repetitive sequences activate the EGFP reporter gene with stable transfection, but not with transient transfection.(A-B) Representative EGFP gene expression induced by different Alu expression vectors were co-transfected into HeLa cells.EGFP expression was determined using a flow cytometer after co-transfection.(C-D) Representative EGFP gene expression induced by different Alu expression vectors were transiently transfected into HeLa cells.(E-G) Representative EGFP gene expression induced by different Alu expression vectors were stably transfected into HeLa cells.(H) The EGFP labeled amount induced by different Alu expression vectors after co-transfection was plotted as mean ± SD values.The EGFP labeled amount of co-transfected with C1-Alu and pcAluas is significantly lower than that of C1-Alu and pcAlu (*p<0.01).(I) The EGFP labeled amount induced by different Alu expression vectors after transient transfection was plotted as mean ± SD values.The EGFP labeled amount of C1-Alu-sense-antisense was significant lower than that of C1-Alu-sense-sense (*p<0.01).(J) The

Table 1 .
Comparison of RNA binding strengths of autosomes with X chromosome Mean ± S.D. of RNA binding strengths of chromosome 1 compared with that of the X chromosome using t-test.**: Mean ± S.D. of RNA binding strengths of chromosome 1 compared with that of Xq using t-test.***: RNA binding strengths of different 50-kb fragments on chromosome 1 and Xq were ordered descendingly, then the former 1/2 fragments of the high RNA binding strengths were chosen and compared using t-test.

Table 2 .
Comparison of RNA binding strengths of inactivation regions with the regions escaping from XCI on Xp ***801 represents that the three inactivation regions totally include 801 50 kb DNA fragments.****2542266 ± 217373.3represents the mean value of RNA binding strengths of the three inactivation regions.

Table 3 .
The cross distribution of repetitive sequences within 1 Mb at the Xq13 region +: peaks of other repetitive sequences at the low ebb regions of L1.

Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 8 November 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201811.0066.v2 repetitive
sequences.Effects of sense or antisense Alu sequences on expression of EGFP reporter were examined in transiently and stably transfected HeLa cells, simulating the effects of repetitive sequences located on chromosomes.

preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 8 November 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201811.0066.v2
to XCI, and vice versa.In our model, RNAs and repetitive sequences are used as activators and inhibitors that participate in the activation or inactivation process of X Preprints (www.