Preprint Technical Note Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Assessing Error Correlations in Remote Sensing-Based Estimates of Forest Attributes for Improved Composite Estimation

Version 1 : Received: 15 October 2017 / Approved: 16 October 2017 / Online: 16 October 2017 (04:30:26 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Ehlers, S.; Saarela, S.; Lindgren, N.; Lindberg, E.; Nyström, M.; Persson, H.J.; Olsson, H.; Ståhl, G. Assessing Error Correlations in Remote Sensing-Based Estimates of Forest Attributes for Improved Composite Estimation. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 667. Ehlers, S.; Saarela, S.; Lindgren, N.; Lindberg, E.; Nyström, M.; Persson, H.J.; Olsson, H.; Ståhl, G. Assessing Error Correlations in Remote Sensing-Based Estimates of Forest Attributes for Improved Composite Estimation. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 667.

Journal reference: Remote Sensing 2018, 10, 667
DOI: 10.3390/rs10050667

Abstract

Today, non-expensive remote sensing (RS) data from different sensors and platforms can be obtained at short intervals and be used for assessing several kinds of forest characteristics at the level of plots, stands and landscapes. Methods such as composite estimation and data assimilation can be used for combining the different sources of information to obtain up-to-date and precise estimates of the characteristics of interest. In composite estimation a standard procedure is to assign weights to the different individual estimates inversely proportional to their variance. However, in case the estimates are correlated, the correlations must be considered in assigning weights or otherwise a composite estimator may be inefficient and its variance be underestimated. In this study we assessed the correlation of plot level estimates of forest characteristics from different RS datasets, between assessments using the same type of sensor as well as across different sensors. The RS data evaluated were SPOT-5 multispectral data, 3D airborne laser scanning data, and TanDEM-X interferometric radar data. Studies were made for plot level mean diameter, mean height, and growing stock volume. All data were acquired from a test site dominated by coniferous forest in southern Sweden. We found that the correlation between plot level estimates based on the same type of RS data were positive and strong, whereas the correlations between estimates using different sources of RS data were not as strong, and weaker for mean height than for mean diameter and volume. The implications of such correlations in composite estimation are demonstrated and it is discussed how correlations may affect results from data assimilation procedures.

Subject Areas

airborne LiDAR; composite estimators; forest inventory; SPOT-5 HRG; TanDEM-X

Readers' Comments and Ratings (0)

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Rate this article
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0
Leave a public comment

×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.