Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Effectiveness Regulation of Construction Land: Does Plan Matter?

Version 1 : Received: 20 March 2017 / Approved: 20 March 2017 / Online: 20 March 2017 (18:42:46 CET)

How to cite: Li, G.; Wu, C.; Zhuo, Y.; Tong, X.; Wei, Y.; Lu, R. Effectiveness Regulation of Construction Land: Does Plan Matter?. Preprints 2017, 2017030165. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201703.0165.v1 Li, G.; Wu, C.; Zhuo, Y.; Tong, X.; Wei, Y.; Lu, R. Effectiveness Regulation of Construction Land: Does Plan Matter?. Preprints 2017, 2017030165. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201703.0165.v1

Abstract

Nowadays the relationship between planning land use and actual land use is not so clear in general. A lot of efforts have been put in the failures of regulation for the expansion of construction land. However, it still lacks an integrated approach to study the effectiveness of land use regulation in terms of different land use types. Furthermore, the existing evaluation of land use plan mainly focuses on a general level, a detailed research on the regulation effectiveness of each construction land use type is absent. Therefore, this research tries to evaluate regulation effectiveness of land use plan, which takes Cangwu country, Guangxi Province as an example. The finding by analysis is that the total area of construction land expansion was about 3494.73 ha, nearly 1.1 times of the plan quota. Moreover, the effectiveness differs greatly in various construction land use types. Town, industrial/mining sites can be well regulated through the quota of land use plan. While, the quota regulation system is not as effective for other type of construction land. Thus, we suggest to improve the regulation effectiveness of construction land through different plan instruments.

Keywords

Regulation Effectiveness; Land Use Plan; Construction Land; China

Subject

Social Sciences, Geography, Planning and Development

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.