Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Three Wind Farm Developments, Three Different Planning Difficulties: Cases from Denmark
Version 1
: Received: 29 April 2023 / Approved: 30 April 2023 / Online: 30 April 2023 (03:26:01 CEST)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Borch, K.; Kirkegaard, J.K.; Nyborg, S. Three Wind Farm Developments, Three Different Planning Difficulties: Cases from Denmark. Energies 2023, 16, 4662. Borch, K.; Kirkegaard, J.K.; Nyborg, S. Three Wind Farm Developments, Three Different Planning Difficulties: Cases from Denmark. Energies 2023, 16, 4662.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to provide a new perspective on the conditions for the multiple dimensions of concerns, and to understand why some wind power projects run smoothly while others lead to unexpected outcomes due to local resistance. The paper described how multiple community concerns about wind power project planning can be described using conflict management theory and by using different procedures to handle tangible and intangible concerns. Policy recommendations are given on how: to minimise overflowing and the risk of the conflicts; to avoid “boxing” community concerns in categories; to give more attention to the intangible and less calculable concerns; to secure appropriate and early planning with proactive involvement of local communities.
Keywords
Wind power planning; community concerns; controversies; overflowing; citizen participation
Subject
Social Sciences, Geography, Planning and Development
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment