Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Mathematical Proof on the Existential Necessity of the World
Version 1
: Received: 20 March 2021 / Approved: 22 March 2021 / Online: 22 March 2021 (15:46:50 CET)
How to cite: Lee, Y. H. Mathematical Proof on the Existential Necessity of the World. Preprints 2021, 2021030549. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202103.0549.v1 Lee, Y. H. Mathematical Proof on the Existential Necessity of the World. Preprints 2021, 2021030549. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202103.0549.v1
Abstract
The "best of all possible worlds" theory (hereinafter the "possible world theory") was presented by Leibniz many centuries ago, and provided an opportunity for metaphysics to understand the ontological meaning of the world in an in-depth way. Furthermore, the theory has multiple impacts on the multiverse theory of modern physics. However, considering the ontological questions of the world solely on linguistics logic leads to basing the possible world theory or the multiverse theory on relatively uncertain inferential reasons. In this study, symbolic logic was used to consider the possible world theory on a more solid foundation. The entire world was made into oneness, and tracking the existential process at the beginning of the world, realized the existential necessity of the world, even though the initial causal point of the world was assumed to be completely void (null set). The existential system in this study, was generalized without specific elements, apart from existence and non-existence. It was discovered that existential possibility and existential necessity are logically equivalent.
Keywords
Possible World; Theories of Universe; Origins of Universe; Existential Possibility; Existential Necessity
Subject
Social Sciences, Anthropology
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment