%  LaTeX support: latex@mdpi.com 
%  For support, please attach all files needed for compiling as well as the log file, and specify your operating system, LaTeX version, and LaTeX editor.

%=================================================================
\documentclass[physics,article,submit,pdftex,oneauthor]{Definitions/mdpi} 
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
\newcommand{\lambdabar}{{\mkern0.75mu\mathchar '26\mkern -9.75mu\lambda}}

% For posting an early version of this manuscript as a preprint, you may use "preprints" as the journal and change "submit" to "accept". The document class line would be, e.g., \documentclass[preprints,article,accept,moreauthors,pdftex]{mdpi}. This is especially recommended for submission to arXiv, where line numbers should be removed before posting. For preprints.org, the editorial staff will make this change immediately prior to posting.

%--------------------
% Class Options:
%--------------------
%----------
% journal
%----------
% Choose between the following MDPI journals:
% acoustics, actuators, addictions, admsci, adolescents, aerospace, agriculture, agriengineering, agronomy, ai, algorithms, allergies, alloys, analytica, animals, antibiotics, antibodies, antioxidants, applbiosci, appliedchem, appliedmath, applmech, applmicrobiol, applnano, applsci, aquacj, architecture, arts, asc, asi, astronomy, atmosphere, atoms, audiolres, automation, axioms, bacteria, batteries, bdcc, behavsci, beverages, biochem, bioengineering, biologics, biology, biomass, biomechanics, biomed, biomedicines, biomedinformatics, biomimetics, biomolecules, biophysica, biosensors, biotech, birds, bloods, blsf, brainsci, breath, buildings, businesses, cancers, carbon, cardiogenetics, catalysts, cells, ceramics, challenges, chemengineering, chemistry, chemosensors, chemproc, children, chips, cimb, civileng, cleantechnol, climate, clinpract, clockssleep, cmd, coasts, coatings, colloids, colorants, commodities, compounds, computation, computers, condensedmatter, conservation, constrmater, cosmetics, covid, crops, cryptography, crystals, csmf, ctn, curroncol, currophthalmol, cyber, dairy, data, dentistry, dermato, dermatopathology, designs, diabetology, diagnostics, dietetics, digital, disabilities, diseases, diversity, dna, drones, dynamics, earth, ebj, ecologies, econometrics, economies, education, ejihpe, electricity, electrochem, electronicmat, electronics, encyclopedia, endocrines, energies, eng, engproc, ent, entomology, entropy, environments, environsciproc, epidemiologia, epigenomes, est, fermentation, fibers, fintech, fire, fishes, fluids, foods, forecasting, forensicsci, forests, foundations, fractalfract, fuels, futureinternet, futureparasites, futurepharmacol, futurephys, futuretransp, galaxies, games, gases, gastroent, gastrointestdisord, gels, genealogy, genes, geographies, geohazards, geomatics, geosciences, geotechnics, geriatrics, hazardousmatters, healthcare, hearts, hemato, heritage, highthroughput, histories, horticulturae, humanities, humans, hydrobiology, hydrogen, hydrology, hygiene, idr, ijerph, ijfs, ijgi, ijms, ijns, ijtm, ijtpp, immuno, informatics, information, infrastructures, inorganics, insects, instruments, inventions, iot, j, jal, jcdd, jcm, jcp, jcs, jdb, jeta, jfb, jfmk, jimaging, jintelligence, jlpea, jmmp, jmp, jmse, jne, jnt, jof, joitmc, jor, journalmedia, jox, jpm, jrfm, jsan, jtaer, jzbg, kidney, kidneydial, knowledge, land, languages, laws, life, liquids, literature, livers, logics, logistics, lubricants, lymphatics, machines, macromol, magnetism, magnetochemistry, make, marinedrugs, materials, materproc, mathematics, mca, measurements, medicina, medicines, medsci, membranes, merits, metabolites, metals, meteorology, methane, metrology, micro, microarrays, microbiolres, micromachines, microorganisms, microplastics, minerals, mining, modelling, molbank, molecules, mps, msf, mti, muscles, nanoenergyadv, nanomanufacturing, nanomaterials, ncrna, network, neuroglia, neurolint, neurosci, nitrogen, notspecified, nri, nursrep, nutraceuticals, nutrients, obesities, oceans, ohbm, onco, oncopathology, optics, oral, organics, organoids, osteology, oxygen, parasites, parasitologia, particles, pathogens, pathophysiology, pediatrrep, pharmaceuticals, pharmaceutics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacy, philosophies, photochem, photonics, phycology, physchem, physics, physiologia, plants, plasma, pollutants, polymers, polysaccharides, poultry, powders, preprints, proceedings, processes, prosthesis, proteomes, psf, psych, psychiatryint, psychoactives, publications, quantumrep, quaternary, qubs, radiation, reactions, recycling, regeneration, religions, remotesensing, reports, reprodmed, resources, rheumato, risks, robotics, ruminants, safety, sci, scipharm, seeds, sensors, separations, sexes, signals, sinusitis, skins, smartcities, sna, societies, socsci, software, soilsystems, solar, solids, sports, standards, stats, stresses, surfaces, surgeries, suschem, sustainability, symmetry, synbio, systems, taxonomy, technologies, telecom, test, textiles, thalassrep, thermo, tomography, tourismhosp, toxics, toxins, transplantology, transportation, traumacare, traumas, tropicalmed, universe, urbansci, uro, vaccines, vehicles, venereology, vetsci, vibration, viruses, vision, waste, water, wem, wevj, wind, women, world, youth, zoonoticdis 

%---------
% article
%---------
% The default type of manuscript is "article", but can be replaced by: 
% abstract, addendum, article, book, bookreview, briefreport, casereport, comment, commentary, communication, conferenceproceedings, correction, conferencereport, entry, expressionofconcern, extendedabstract, datadescriptor, editorial, essay, erratum, hypothesis, interestingimage, obituary, opinion, projectreport, reply, retraction, review, perspective, protocol, shortnote, studyprotocol, systematicreview, supfile, technicalnote, viewpoint, guidelines, registeredreport, tutorial
% supfile = supplementary materials

%----------
% submit
%----------
% The class option "submit" will be changed to "accept" by the Editorial Office when the paper is accepted. This will only make changes to the frontpage (e.g., the logo of the journal will get visible), the headings, and the copyright information. Also, line numbering will be removed. Journal info and pagination for accepted papers will also be assigned by the Editorial Office.

%------------------
% moreauthors
%------------------
% If there is only one author the class option oneauthor should be used. Otherwise use the class option moreauthors.

%---------
% pdftex
%---------
% The option pdftex is for use with pdfLaTeX. If eps figures are used, remove the option pdftex and use LaTeX and dvi2pdf.

%=================================================================
% MDPI internal commands
\firstpage{1} 
\makeatletter 
\setcounter{page}{\@firstpage} 
\makeatother
\pubvolume{1}
\issuenum{1}
\articlenumber{0}
\pubyear{2022}
\copyrightyear{2022}
%\externaleditor{Academic Editor: Firstname Lastname}
\datereceived{} 
\dateaccepted{} 
\datepublished{} 
%\datecorrected{} % Corrected papers include a "Corrected: XXX" date in the original paper.
%\dateretracted{} % Corrected papers include a "Retracted: XXX" date in the original paper.
\hreflink{https://doi.org/} % If needed use \linebreak
%\doinum{}
%------------------------------------------------------------------
% The following line should be uncommented if the LaTeX file is uploaded to arXiv.org
%\pdfoutput=1

%=================================================================
% Add packages and commands here. The following packages are loaded in our class file: fontenc, inputenc, calc, indentfirst, fancyhdr, graphicx, epstopdf, lastpage, ifthen, lineno, float, amsmath, setspace, enumitem, mathpazo, booktabs, titlesec, etoolbox, tabto, xcolor, soul, multirow, microtype, tikz, totcount, changepage, attrib, upgreek, cleveref, amsthm, hyphenat, natbib, hyperref, footmisc, url, geometry, newfloat, caption

%=================================================================
%% Please use the following mathematics environments: Theorem, Lemma, Corollary, Proposition, Characterization, Property, Problem, Example, ExamplesandDefinitions, Hypothesis, Remark, Definition, Notation, Assumption
%% For proofs, please use the proof environment (the amsthm package is loaded by the MDPI class).

%=================================================================
% Full title of the paper (Capitalized)
\Title{A Classical Based Scalar Field Model Provides a Fundamental Bridge Between General Relativity Effects and Quantum Mechanics}

% MDPI internal command: Title for citation in the left column
\TitleCitation{A Classical Based Scalar Field Model Provides a Fundamental Bridge Between General Relativity Effects and Quantum Mechanics}

% Author Orchid ID: enter ID or remove command
\newcommand{\orcidauthorA}{0000-0000-0000-000X} % Add \orcidA{} behind the author's name
%\newcommand{\orcidauthorB}{0000-0000-0000-000X} % Add \orcidB{} behind the author's name

% Authors, for the paper (add full first names)
\Author{Rickey Austin $^{1,\dagger}$\orcidA{0000-0002-5833-9272}}

%\longauthorlist{yes}

% MDPI internal command: Authors, for metadata in PDF
\AuthorNames{Rickey Austin}

% MDPI internal command: Authors, for citation in the left column
\AuthorCitation{Austin, R.}
% If this is a Chicago style journal: Lastname, Firstname, Firstname Lastname, and Firstname Lastname.

% Affiliations / Addresses (Add [1] after \address if there is only one affiliation.)
\address[1]{%
$^{1}$ \quad St Claire Scientific Research, Development and Publications; rickeywaustin@stclairesrdp.com
}

% Contact information of the corresponding author
\corres{Correspondence: rickeywaustin@stclairesrdp.com;}

% Current address and/or shared authorship
\firstnote{Current address: Albuquerque, NM} 
% \secondnote{These authors contributed equally to this work.}
% The commands \thirdnote{} till \eighthnote{} are available for further notes

%\simplesumm{} % Simple summary

%\conference{} % An extended version of a conference paper

% Abstract (Do not insert blank lines, i.e. \\) 
\abstract{
	Herein is introduced a simple scalar field model derived from classical based kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy, and Special Relativity’s rest mass energy.  By applying a classical orbit over the scalar field, relativistic effects are predicted. The scalar field is then applied to a classical model of the Hydrogen atom resulting in a relativistic effect equal to the binding energy of the Hydrogen atom. In addition, the model derives the fine structure constant due to the gravitational effect. The relativistic effects are then discretized in increments equal to the model’s gravitational induced constant.  The discretization produces the Hydrogen atom spectral emissions and an angular moment equal to Planck’s reduced constant. The model is not presented as a replacement for current theory, rather it is for inspection and illustration of how a simplistic model may offer a fundamental bridge between the more complex, time proven theories of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.
}

% Keywords
\keyword{Classical Model; General Relativity; Hydrogen Atom, Fine Structure Constant, Planck Constant, Dark Energy, Dark Matter} 

% The fields PACS, MSC, and JEL may be left empty or commented out if not applicable
%\PACS{J0101}
%\MSC{}
%\JEL{}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Only for the journal Diversity
%\LSID{\url{http://}}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Only for the journal Applied Sciences:
%\featuredapplication{Authors are encouraged to provide a concise description of the specific application or a potential application of the work. This section is not mandatory.}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Only for the journal Data:
%\dataset{DOI number or link to the deposited data set in cases where the data set is published or set to be published separately. If the data set is submitted and will be published as a supplement to this paper in the journal Data, this field will be filled by the editors of the journal. In this case, please make sure to submit the data set as a supplement when entering your manuscript into our manuscript editorial system.}

%\datasetlicense{license under which the data set is made available (CC0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-BY-NC, etc.)}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Only for the journal Toxins
%\keycontribution{The breakthroughs or highlights of the manuscript. Authors can write one or two sentences to describe the most important part of the paper.}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Only for the journal Encyclopedia
%\encyclopediadef{Instead of the abstract}
%\entrylink{The Link to this entry published on the encyclopedia platform.}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\setcounter{section}{-1} %% Remove this when starting to work on the template.


% The order of the section titles is: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions for these journals: aerospace,algorithms,antibodies,antioxidants,atmosphere,axioms,biomedicines,carbon,crystals,designs,diagnostics,environments,fermentation,fluids,forests,fractalfract,informatics,information,inventions,jfmk,jrfm,lubricants,neonatalscreening,neuroglia,particles,pharmaceutics,polymers,processes,technologies,viruses,vision

\section{Introduction}
As part of my doctoral thesis a method was derived for introductory teaching of General Relativity (GR) via starting with Newtonian laws \cite{2017PhDThesisRAUSTIN}.  From Newtonian laws GR effects are derived to first order equality in Schwarzschild's solution to Einstein's field equations.  The derivation methodology follows  the same method as when Special Relativity is derived by limiting the speed of particles to the speed of light in a vacuum \cite{Austin_2017}.  In a continuation of the study I introduce here a scalar field $S$ derived from Newtonian Gravitational potential and classical kinetic energy.  By applying Newtonian mechanics over $S$, it is shown GR effects are included in the Newtonian calculations.  
This method when applied to celestial orbits predicts a perihelion advance.  The results of the calculations provide high fidelity compared to known measurements and mainstream theories. 

Next, the field $S$ is applied to a classical notion of an electron orbiting a proton.  In this application of $S$, an electron orbital advance is predicted.  The model shows in addition to the classical Coulomb binding energy, an additional binding energy resulting from the orbital advance.  The total binding energy is evaluated when an interacting photon has a wavelength equal to the reduced Compton wavelength for the electron.  At this equality, the additional binding energy due to the advance is equal the binding energy of Bohr's Hydrogen model for the atom \cite{BohrAtomicModel}, 27.2 eV.  

\section{Introduction}
Here a scalar field model $S$ is generated by equating a virtual point mass's classical kinetic and potential energy as a ratio to the rest energy of the mass generating the field. Then the model is used to investigate time dilation as an effect of the field due to the mass. The results are then compared to Schwarzschild's solution\cite{schwarzschild1999gravitational} to Einstein's field equations for matching accepted theory.  
Next, the field $S$ is applied to a classical based model of an electron orbiting a proton.  In this investigation of $S$, an electron orbital advance is predicted.  The model shows in addition to the classical Coulomb binding energy\cite{GP1}, an additional binding energy resulting from the orbital advance.  The model's total binding energy is evaluated when a photon with wavelength equal to the reduced Compton wavelength\cite{website:CODATALambda} interacts with the electron.  At this equality, the additional binding energy due to the advance is equal the binding energy of the Hydrogen atom (13.6 eV)\cite{website:CODATALambda}.
\section{The Scalar Field Model}

The scalar field is derived from Newtonian gravitational potential and classical kinetic energy\cite{GP1}.  The gravitational potential is mapped to the field by considering a virtual point particle ($m_v$) equal to the mass ($M$) generating the field.  The gravitational potential of $m_v$ is calculated for all space with radial distance greater than or equal to the radius of $M$. 
The potential value at each point is equated by:
\begin{equation}\label{q1}
	V_g=-\frac{G M m_v}{r^2}
\end{equation}
Where $G$ is the Newtonian Gravitational constant\cite{website:CODATALambda} and $r$ is the radial distance from the center of mass $M$ to the point mass $m_v$.  
Secondly the kinetic energy of $m_v$ relative to $M$ is calculated by:
\begin{equation}\label{q2}
	T_g=\frac{m_v v^2}{2}	
\end{equation}
Where $v$ is the instantaneous velocity of $m_v$ relative to $M$. The energies in equations (\ref{q1} \& \ref{q2}) when combined form the classical total energy of $m_v$ \cite{Marion}.  Lastly, the total energy is evaluated as a ratio to $M$'s rest mass's energy and added to unity.  The proportionality is a dimensionless scalar value:
\begin{equation}\label{eqTransform}
	A= 1 + \frac{T_g - V_g}{E_0}
\end{equation}
It is here hypothesized the value $A$ represents the scalar time rate of a location in the field, proportional to the time rate at a location where no gravitational influence exist. To transform the field's observed time rate at a location ($t_{local}$) to the observed time rate at infinity ($t_{\infty}$), apply equation \ref{eqTransform} thus forth:
\begin{equation}\label{eqT1}
	t_{\infty}=A \cdot t_{local} 
\end{equation}
Here the term Exemplar space is introduced for convenience, to represent any space where there is no gravitational influence.  In Exemplar space, the value of A by definition is 1.  
\begin{equation}\label{eqAE}
	A_{Exemplar} \equiv 1
\end{equation}

In following Einstein's postulate of the universal observed speed of light ($c$) \cite{Einstein1905SR}, locally observed measurements of time and length are determined by the distance a ray of light travels in one unit of time ($\hat{t}$) as measured locally.  The unit of length ($\hat{l}$) is:    
\begin{equation}\label{q4}
	\hat{l}=c \hat{t}
\end{equation} 
From any location within the field, the unit length and unit time are related to the unit length and unit time in Exemplar space by:
\begin{equation}\label{q5}
	\hat{l}_{exemplar}= A_{local}  \hat{l_{local}}
\end{equation}
Where $A$ is locally calculated.  From this relatively non-complex scalar field, utilizing transformations from local space to Exemplar space, General Relativity effects are investigated.
\section{Relativistic effects in $S$}
\subsection{Time Dilation}
Using equation \ref{eqTransform}, a clock $c_1$ at radial distance $r_1$ is compared to a clock $c_{E1}$ in Exemplar space:  
\begin{equation}
	c_{E1}=A_1 c_1 = \left( 1 + \frac{v_1^2}{2 c^2} + \frac{G M}{r_1 c^2}\right) c_1
\end{equation}
Where $A_1$ is the calculated field value at location $r_1$ from the center of mass $M$. When $v_1$ equals zero: 
\begin{equation}\label{qa2}
	c_{E1}=A_1 c_1 = \left( 1 + \frac{G M}{r_1 c^2}\right) c_1
\end{equation}
In Schwarzschild's metric \cite{schwarzschild1999gravitational}, at a radial distance $r$ from the center of mass $M$ with zero radial velocity, the local clock rate $\tau$ as compared to a clock rate ($t$) an infinite distance from the mass ($M$) is:
\begin{equation}\label{q1b}
	t=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{G M}{r c^2}}}\tau
\end{equation}
Performing a binomial expansion on equation \ref{q1b} for $\frac{G M}{r c^2}$ :
\begin{equation}\label{q1c}
	t= \left( 1+\frac{G M}{r c^2} + ...\right)\tau
\end{equation}
Analyzing equations \ref{qa2} and \ref{q1c} the model produces an equivalent measurement of time dilation to a minimum first order equivalence of Schwarzschild's metric in GR. 
\subsection{Orbits in the Scalar Field Model}
Consider a circular orbit in $S$ about a massive object. To calculate the orbital transformation from a non-exemplar space to exemplar space requires squaring the value of A.  This is because both distance and time are transformed.  The transformation of the circumference $C_l$ to $C_E$ takes the form:
\begin{equation}\label{q8}
	C_E=2\pi A r = 2\pi \left( 1 + \frac{G M}{2 r c^2} + \frac{G M}{r c^2} \right)^2r
\end{equation}
Where the potential is calculated from a gravitational orbit.  Of interest, equation \ref{q8} shows for any gravitational circular orbit there will be a first order advance of:
\begin{equation}\label{q9}
	advance = 2\pi \left( 1 + \frac{3 G M}{2 c^2}\right)^2
\end{equation}
Note the radial value r cancels out and one is left with a constant advance in length for all circular orbits regardless of radial distance from the central massive object.  For orbits that are not circular but elliptical, the radial distance can be calculated as a dependency on the angle of rotation\cite{Gravitation} by setting r equal to:
\begin{equation} \label{q10}
	r =  \frac{a(1-e^2)}{1+e cos(\theta)}   	
\end{equation}
Where $a$ is the semi-major axis, e is the eccentricity, and $\theta$ is the angle of rotation. Integrating the value for $\theta$ over the angle of $2\pi$ for one period $P$ yields the advance.  The full calculation to first order of the model is:
\begin{equation}\label{eqAdvance}
	\int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{2\pi} 
	\left(
	\left(  1 + 
	\left( \frac{3G M}{2 
		\left(\frac{a 
			\left(1-e^2 
			\right)}{1+e cos(\theta)} 
		\right) c^2}
	\right)  
	\right)^2 -1 
	\right) d\theta dP
\end{equation}
The -1 is applied such that only the advance is calculated and not the entire elliptical circumference.  When equation \ref{eqAdvance} is applied to the planet Mercury, it predicts an advance of 42.98 arc seconds per century which agrees closely to observations \cite{Park_2017} and General Relativity effects. 
\section{Classical Model of the Hydrogen Atom in $S$}
In the classical approach, the electron is modeled to orbit the proton in the same way a planet orbits the sun.  
In modeling the Hydrogen atom the classical Coulomb equation is implemented into $S$ for equating A:
\begin{equation}\label{eqTransformationCompleteHydrogen}
	A(r,m,v)= 1 +  \frac{e^2}{ 8\pi \epsilon_0 m_e r c^2}+\frac{G M_p}{2 r c^2} + \frac{G M_p}{r c^2}
\end{equation}
Where $M_p$ is the proton mass, $\epsilon_0$ is vacuum permittivity, $r$ the radial distance from the center of the proton, $e$ is the elementary charge, and $c$ is the speed of light.  Equation \ref{eqTransformationCompleteHydrogen} is squared in the same manner as with the celestial orbit:
\begin{equation}\label{eqTransformationAdvanceSquaredHydrogen}
	A(r,m,v)^2= 1 + \frac{e^2}{ 4\pi \epsilon_0 m_e r c^2}
\end{equation} 
The second order contributions and the gravitational potential have been omitted in equation \ref{eqTransformationAdvanceSquaredHydrogen} as their contributions are very small compared to the Coulomb contribution.  As with the gravitational orbit, when calculating an advance in orbit, the additional distance traversed per revolution in a circular orbit is:
\begin{equation}\label{eqTransformationAdvance2Hydrogen}
	Advance= 2\pi \left( \frac{e^2}{ 4\pi \epsilon_0  m_e c^2}\right)
\end{equation}
Equation $\ref{eqTransformationAdvance2Hydrogen}$ is for a circular orbit.  It is assumed any observed measurement will predict an orbital period as starting and ending at the same point for each completed orbit (in a circular orbit).  This orbital observance omits any advance in the orbital system.  As such,  according the the model, the total binding force of the orbit will be greater than the classically predicted binding energy.

\subsection{Electron Binding Energy of the Hydrogen Atom in $S$}
In analyzing the model's predicted additional binding energy due to the orbital advance, the classical Coulomb potential energy\cite{GP2} is considered:
\begin{equation}\label{eqCoulombEnergy}
	E_{C}=\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon r}
\end{equation}
along with the additional energy needed to traverse the advance in equation \ref{eqTransformationAdvance2Hydrogen}. If one takes the ratio of the advance to the circumference of the orbit, it is:
\begin{equation}\label{eqRatio}
	ratio = \frac{adv}{2 \pi r}=\frac{\left( \frac{adv}{2\pi} \right) }{r}
\end{equation}
Using the value from equation \ref{eqRatio} and multiplying it by the Coulomb energy, the additional energy is derived. The additional energy due to the advance is:
\begin{equation}\label{eq999}
	E_A(r)=\left( \frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon  r} \right) \left(\frac{\left( \frac{adv}{2\pi} \right) }{r} \right)
\end{equation}
The derived total energy $E_T(r)$ is obtained by equating the energy of the classical orbit $E_C(r)$ plus the additional energy due to the orbital advance $E_A(r)$ as a function of radial distance $r$:
\begin{equation}\label{eqtotal1}
	E_T(r)= E_C(r)+E_A(r)=\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon r}+ \left( \frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon  r} \right) \left(\frac{\left( \frac{adv}{2\pi} \right) }{r} \right)
\end{equation}
where $r$ is the radial distance between the proton and electron.  
\subsection{Photon Interaction with the Hydrogen Atom in $S$}
The energy of a photon with wavelength $r$ is\cite{GP2}: 
\begin{equation}\label{eqEgammaRT}
	E_{\gamma}(r)=\frac{h c}{r}
\end{equation}
Setting equation \ref{eqEgammaRT} equal to $E_T(r)$ (equation \ref{eqtotal1}) and adding variable $K$ as the value of proportionality between $E_{\gamma}(r)$ and $E_T(r)$: 
\begin{equation}\label{q1928}
	K \left(\frac{h c}{r}\right)=\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon r}+ \left( \frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon  r} \right) \left(\frac{\left( \frac{adv}{2\pi} \right) }{r} \right)
\end{equation}
Solving for $K$:
\begin{equation} \label{q1234}
	k= \left( \frac{\left(\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon r} \right)}{ \left( \frac{h c}{r} \right)     }  \right)+
	\left( \frac{ \left( \left( \frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon  r} \right) \left(\frac{\left( \frac{adv}{2\pi} \right) }{r} \right) \right)    }{ \left( \frac{h c}{r} \right)} \right)
\end{equation}
Reducing and rearranging equation \ref{q1234} and using equation \ref{eqTransformationAdvance2Hydrogen} for the advance value:
\begin{equation}
	K= \frac{1}{2 \pi}\left( \frac{e^2}{2 \epsilon_0 h c} + \frac{e^2}{2 \epsilon_0 h c} \left( \frac{adv}{2\pi r} \right)  \right)
\end{equation}
From equation \ref{q1928}, the photon energy equivalent to  $E_{T}(r)$ as a function of $\lambda$ is:
\begin{equation} \label{q4321}
	E_{\gamma}(\lambda) = 
	\overbrace{
		\underbrace{	
			\frac{E_C(\lambda)}{K(\lambda)} 
		}_\text{Coulomb/K}
		+  
		\underbrace{
			\frac{E_A(\lambda)}{K(\lambda)}
		}_\text{Advance/k}
	}^\text{Total Potential Energy}
\end{equation}
When one investigates $\lambda=\lambdabar_e$ (the reduced Compton wavelength\cite{website:CODATALambda} ) equation \ref{q4321} generates the following values:
\begin{align}
	\lambda &= \lambdabar_e	\\
	Advance &= 2 \pi r_e \label{eq-re} \\
	Ratio &= \alpha \\
	r = \lambdabar_e &=\frac{r_e}{\alpha} \\
	E_{\gamma}(\lambda_{\tau}) &= 2 \pi m_e c^2 \\
	E_C(r) &=\alpha m_e c^2 \\
	E_A(r) &= \alpha^2 m_e c^2 \\
\end{align}
Where $\alpha$ is the fine structure constant\cite{website:CODATALambda} , $r_e$ is the classical electron radius\cite{website:CODATALambda} , and $m_e$ is the mass of the electron. For a visual representation of the list of equations and values see Figure \ref{figCoulombPotentialWell}.  The equations are derived from the predicted advance of the electron orbit.  The advance causes an additional energy $E_A(r)$ equated as traditional Coulomb energy $E'_C(r')$.  The potential/binding energies allowable and the angular momentum states allowable energy occur at discrete energy levels. 
\begin{figure}[h]
	\centering
	\includegraphics[width=.75\linewidth]{MainCorrelation.png}
	\caption{Equation Breakout}
	\label{figCoulombPotentialWell}
\end{figure}

If an investigator examined the energy from $E_A(r)$ it is logical to imagine they would consider it a Coulomb based potential energy.  As such, from a classical viewpoint the energy would relate to equation \ref{eqCoulombEnergy}.  In terms of classical Coulomb energy, the advance induced energy is:
\begin{equation}\label{q3465}
	E'_{C}(r')=\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon r'}=E_A(r)=\left( \frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon  r} \right) \left(\frac{\left( \frac{adv}{2\pi} \right) }{r} \right)
\end{equation}
To remove ambiguity the new Coulomb based equation representing an investigator's evaluation of $E_A(r)$ is marked with a prime symbol. The value of $E_A(r)$ when $\lambda=\lambdabar_e$ is:
\begin{equation}\label{qt1}
	E_A(r)= \alpha^2 m_e c^2 =E'_{C}(r')
\end{equation}
The energy in equation \ref{qt1} is equivalent to the classical potential energy of the electron to the proton in the Hydrogen atom ($27.12$ $eV$).

Recall from the model, the advance of the electron (equation \ref{eq-re}) is an invariant distance $2 \pi r_e$ for any orbit.  If one increments the radial magnitude by integer multiples of $r_e$, discrete energy levels are generated.  Using equation \ref{q3465} and solving for $r{'}$ (when $\lambda=\lambdabar_e$ ):
\begin{equation}\label{qrprime}
	r{'}=\frac{\left( \frac{r_e}{\alpha}\right)^2}{r_e}
\end{equation}
Discretize equation \ref{qrprime} in increments of $r_e$ by adding the value $n$ to the equation where $n=\{1,2,3,..n\}$:
\begin{equation}
	r{'}(n)=\frac{\left( \frac{n r_e}{\alpha}\right)^2}{r_e}
\end{equation}
One can now ascertain the conversion of $E_{C}^{'}(r{'})$ into a step function of $r_e$ (the gravitational induced constant of the electron orbital advance) by:  
\begin{equation}
	\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon r{'}}=\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon r} \rightarrow r{'}(n)=\frac{\left( \frac{n r_e}{\alpha} \right)^2}{r_e}=\frac{n^2r_e}{\alpha^2}
\end{equation}
Thus the energy in equation \ref{q3465} has discrete allowable energy magnitudes via the following equation:
\begin{equation}\label{eqCoulombEnergyB}
	E_{C}^{'}(n)=\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon \frac{n^2r_e}{\alpha^2}}=\frac{\alpha^2 e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 n^2 r_e}
\end{equation}
Interpreting equation \ref{eqCoulombEnergyB} the total potential energy of the Hydrogen atom may only take on discrete values due to the advance of the electron (a gravitational effect).  Thus, the following potential energies are allowed for the system:
\begin{align}
	E_{C}^{'}(1)&=\frac{\alpha^2 e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (1^2) r_e} \\
	E_{C}^{'}(2)&=\frac{\alpha^2 e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 (2^2) r_e} \\
	...\\
	E_{C}^{'}(n)&=\frac{\alpha^2 e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 n^2 r_e}
\end{align}
According the Virial theorem \cite{ModernPhysics} the average kinetic energy of an orbiting particle will have half the average potential energy of the bound system \cite{H4}.  Thus, to remove an electron from an $n$ state energy, $\frac{1}{2} E_{C}^{'}(n)$ is required. Listed below are the values for the first three states.
\begin{align}
	\left( \frac{1}{2} \right) E_{C}^{'}(1) = 13.6\; eV \\
	\left( \frac{1}{2} \right) E_{C}^{'}(2) = 3.40\; eV \\
	\left( \frac{1}{2} \right) E_{C}^{'}(3) = 1.51\; eV \\	
\end{align}
If one considers the difference between energy levels, the differential energies match the Hydrogen spectral emissions \cite{website:NISTSpectra}:
\begin{align}
	\left( \frac{1}{2} \right) E_{C}^{'}(1) -\left( \frac{1}{2} \right) E_{C}^{'}(2) = 10.20\; eV\\
	\left( \frac{1}{2} \right) E_{C}^{'}(1) -\left( \frac{1}{2} \right) E_{C}^{'}(3) = 12.09\; eV\\
\end{align}
These are representative of the Lyman series \cite{Lymanseries}. Other series may be derived in a similar manner.
\subsection{Hydrogen Atom's Electron Angular Momentum in the Scalar Field Model}
A natural continuation of analyzing the model is to classically calculate the angular momentum of an electron in orbit around a proton.  In order to calculate  angular momentum, velocity is required.  From deriving equation \ref{eqTransformationCompleteHydrogen} the velocity as a function of $r$ is:
\begin{equation}\label{q1h}
	v(r)=\sqrt{\frac{e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 m_e r}}
\end{equation}
Using the value of $r=\frac{r_e}{\alpha}$ from equation \ref{eq-re}, $v(r)$ is:
\begin{equation}
	v(r)=\sqrt{\frac{\alpha e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 m_e r}}
\end{equation}
Combining the radius, mass, and velocity the classically derived angular momentum at $r$ is:
\begin{equation}\label{eAngularH}
	\mathcal{L}_T(r)=r m v =\sqrt{\frac{r_e m_e e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \alpha}}
\end{equation}
If one steps the radial value by integer multiples of $r_e$  equation \ref{eAngularH} is transformed to a discrete equation:
\begin{equation}\label{eAngularH3}
	\mathcal{L}_T(n)=r m v =\sqrt{\frac{n r_e m_e e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \alpha}}
\end{equation}
Where $n$ takes on an integer value $\{1,2,3..\}$.  Next, equate the angular momentum $\mathcal{L}{'}$ using equation \ref{qrprime} for $r{'}$:
\begin{equation}\label{qAngularPrime}
	\mathcal{L}{'}(n)=
	\left( \frac{\left( \frac{n\; r_e}{\alpha}\right)^2}{r_e} \right) m_e 
	\sqrt{\left( 
		\frac{e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon m_e \left( \frac{\left( \frac{n\;r_e}{\alpha}\right)^2}{r_e} \right) }
		\right)}=n \hbar
\end{equation}
\section{Discussion and Conjectures}
Equation \ref{qAngularPrime} provides a straight forward understanding of the model's prediction.  The angular momentum of the system must step in discrete increments of energy.  When $\lambda = \lambdabar_e $ the discrete energy step is $\hbar$.  This correlation shows a one to one relation between the gravitational induced advance of the electron and the discrete angular momentum levels allowed.  This provides a direct link from gravitational effects to a causal effect of quantum discrete energy levels in the angular momentum of an electron proton system.   The model predicts a photon of wavelength $\lambdabar_e$ interacting with the orbital will only generate a portion of the total energy (13.6 eV).  This implies there may be a violation of conservation of energy within the model.  
\subsection{Contracting Space-Time}
As a possible explanation for why only the $E_A$ portion of energy is emitted with an incoming photon, it is here conjectured that a photon's interaction with the system only creates or absorbs photons when space-time is contracting or expanding.  This conjecture leads to the following postulate for the model:  \textit{ Photon creation and absorption only happens when there is a change in the curvature of space-time}. Mathematically:
\begin{equation}
	\Delta C = 
	\begin{cases}
		\mbox{absorption}, & \mbox{When $\Delta$C is positive} \\ \mbox{creation}, & \mbox{When $\Delta$C is negative}
	\end{cases}
\end{equation}
Where $C$ is the curvature of space-time.  When the change in curvature is positive (increasing - away from zero curvature) there is an energy increase in the system causing the change in space-time curvature, thus the energy was adsorbed.  When the change in curvature is negative (decreasing - toward zero curvature) there is an energy decrease in the system causing the change in space-time curvature, thus energy is created (photon).  When over a period of time $\Delta C = 0$ there will be no absorption or creation of photons.  For clarity, the postulate states when a change of the curvature of space-time happens (an event), the event generates either an absorption or creation of a photon.  If there is no event (i.e. change in the curvature of space-time) then no photon is absorbed or created.  The generated photon is proportional to the change in the curvature of space-time.

How does this relate to the conservation of energy?  If the postulate holds, then the incoming energy of the photon would have been considered only 13.6 eV, and not $2\pi m_e$. This is because the previous interaction with matter to measure the interaction of the photon would have been measured by the event of the change in the curvature of space (thus only considered 13.6 eV).  In other words, the additional energy would be hidden from observation because its interaction did not create or absorb a photon equal to the total energy, but to the observed energy as generated by the change in curvature of space-time.     

\section{Conclusion}
In conclusion it has been shown a scalar field model produces results comparable to Schwarzschild's solution to Einstein's field equations.  In applying the model to a classical model of the Hydrogen atom, an unexpected prediction arose.  The model predicted an additional binding energy to the classical model that is equivalent to the binding energy of the Hydrogen atom when the energy of the system is equated to the rest mass energy of the electron. The derived gravitational induced constant angle of advance of the electron's orbit is the fine structure constant.  In addition, when discretized, the model provides accurate spectral emissions for the Hydrogen atom and a one to one relation between Planck's reduced constant $\hbar$ and the orbital advance caused by the gravitational effect. 

Understanding the reason(s) the model presents accuracy to empirical data when the system's energy is equivalent to the rest energy of the electron merits further research.  Although by adding a strong and far reaching postulate, an explanation may exist.  The postulate would help explain why only the gravitational predicted effect generates photons, and only generates them when space-time contracts.  This is a postulate of great impact across many disciplines and needs much research, vetting, before fully implementing it into the field model.  

Another area of investigation is the amount of energy the model predicts that is not representative of a photon-matter interaction.  Recall the model only shows the gravitational effect generating a photon.  As such there is a predicted ratio of $\alpha^{-2}$ of photon observed energy to non-luminous energy.  If such an energy exits it may prove beneficial in the hunt for dark matter or dark energy.  These conjectures coupled with the model's initial agreement with empirical data and accepted theory warrants deeper investigation, as well as if there are any physical relevancy to the model's predictions.

% Example of a page in landscape format (with table and table footnote).
%\startlandscape
%\begin{table}[H] %% Table in wide page
%\caption{This is a very wide table.\label{tab3}}
%	\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{CCCC}
%		\toprule
%		\textbf{Title 1}	& \textbf{Title 2}	& \textbf{Title 3}	& \textbf{Title 4}\\
%		\midrule
%		Entry 1		& Data			& Data			& This cell has some longer content that runs over two lines.\\
%		Entry 2		& Data			& Data			& Data\textsuperscript{1}\\
%		\bottomrule
%	\end{tabularx}
%	\begin{adjustwidth}{+\extralength}{0cm}
%		\noindent\footnotesize{\textsuperscript{1} This is a table footnote.}
%	\end{adjustwidth}
%\end{table}
%\finishlandscape
%Please punctuate equations as regular text. Theorem-type environments (including propositions, lemmas, corollaries etc.) can be formatted as follows:
%% Example of a theorem:

\funding{The Author wishes to thank Saint Claire Scientific Research and Publications for providing funding making this research possible.}


% \newpage
% \input{files/Appendix.tex}


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% Optional

\begin{adjustwidth}{-\extralength}{0cm}
%\printendnotes[custom] % Un-comment to print a list of endnotes
\newpage
\reftitle{References}

% Please provide either the correct journal abbreviation (e.g. according to the “List of Title Word Abbreviations” http://www.issn.org/services/online-services/access-to-the-ltwa/) or the full name of the journal.
% Citations and References in Supplementary files are permitted provided that they also appear in the reference list here. 

%=====================================
% References, variant A: external bibliography
%=====================================
%\bibliography{your_external_BibTeX_file}
 \bibliography{Austin.bib}
 

% If authors have biography, please use the format belowe^
%\section*{Short Biography of Authors}
%\bio
%{\raisebox{-0.35cm}{\includegraphics[width=3.5cm,height=5.3cm,clip,keepaspectratio]{Definitions/author1.pdf}}}
%{\textbf{Firstname Lastname} Biography of first author}
%
%\bio
%{\raisebox{-0.35cm}{\includegraphics[width=3.5cm,height=5.3cm,clip,keepaspectratio]{Definitions/author2.jpg}}}
%{\textbf{Firstname Lastname} Biography of second author}

% For the MDPI journals use author-date citation, please follow the formatting guidelines on http://www.mdpi.com/authors/references
% To cite two works by the same author: \citeauthor{ref-journal-1a} (\citeyear{ref-journal-1a}, \citeyear{ref-journal-1b}). This produces: Whittaker (1967, 1975)
% To cite two works by the same author with specific pages: \citeauthor{ref-journal-3a} (\citeyear{ref-journal-3a}, p. 328; \citeyear{ref-journal-3b}, p.475). This produces: Wong (1999, p. 328; 2000, p. 475)

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% for journal Sci
%\reviewreports{\\
%Reviewer 1 comments and authors’ response\\
%Reviewer 2 comments and authors’ response\\
%Reviewer 3 comments and authors’ response
%}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\end{adjustwidth}
\end{document}

